<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Want&#8217;s to Predict the Lottery?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://farhanrehman.co.uk/2009/09/11/who-wants-to-predict-the-lottery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://farhanrehman.co.uk/2009/09/11/who-wants-to-predict-the-lottery/</link>
	<description>News, Reviews, Gadgets, Tech and all things Geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:03:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Farhan Rehman</title>
		<link>http://farhanrehman.co.uk/2009/09/11/who-wants-to-predict-the-lottery/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Farhan Rehman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farhanrehman.co.uk/?p=246#comment-54</guid>
		<description>@Dean
I did see him describe the coin toss experiment being based on nothing more than maths, but from a statistical point of view, the probability of one person accomplishing 10 successful combinations, whilst the other person only gets one combination is most definitely skewed given my basic understanding of probability and statistics.. 

There&#039;s also the work of &lt;a href=&quot;http://tillerfoundation.com/index.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;William Tiller&lt;/a&gt;, where thoughts have been shown to directly affect physical reality, especially in skewing seemingly &#039;neutral&#039; probability based events, (see &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/whatthebleep&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;What The Bleep Do We Know!?&lt;/a&gt; for a more detailed explanation of this worldview).  

There is also the work of Rupert Sheldrake that talks about morphogenetic fields, and how a group effect is both possible, and probable in terms of generating a telepathic effect, especially with his theory of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sheldrake.org/Articles&amp;Papers/papers/morphic/morphic_intro.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;morphic fields&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dean<br />
I did see him describe the coin toss experiment being based on nothing more than maths, but from a statistical point of view, the probability of one person accomplishing 10 successful combinations, whilst the other person only gets one combination is most definitely skewed given my basic understanding of probability and statistics.. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s also the work of <a href="http://tillerfoundation.com/index.php" rel="nofollow">William Tiller</a>, where thoughts have been shown to directly affect physical reality, especially in skewing seemingly &#8216;neutral&#8217; probability based events, (see <a href="http://bit.ly/whatthebleep" rel="nofollow">What The Bleep Do We Know!?</a> for a more detailed explanation of this worldview).  </p>
<p>There is also the work of Rupert Sheldrake that talks about morphogenetic fields, and how a group effect is both possible, and probable in terms of generating a telepathic effect, especially with his theory of <a href="http://www.sheldrake.org/Articles&#038;Papers/papers/morphic/morphic_intro.html" rel="nofollow">morphic fields</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://farhanrehman.co.uk/2009/09/11/who-wants-to-predict-the-lottery/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 14:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farhanrehman.co.uk/?p=246#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Farhan, if you&#039;d watched the program properly, you&#039;d have seen that the support group of people for the coin toss experiment made no difference - it was based on maths.

Derren Brown doesn&#039;t believe in anything psychic. Although the wisdom of crowds theory does exist, that&#039;s not how he predicted the 6 lottery numbers. Sure, he got them together and they managed to get 4, but that final &#039;prediction&#039; was done using a camera trick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Farhan, if you&#8217;d watched the program properly, you&#8217;d have seen that the support group of people for the coin toss experiment made no difference &#8211; it was based on maths.</p>
<p>Derren Brown doesn&#8217;t believe in anything psychic. Although the wisdom of crowds theory does exist, that&#8217;s not how he predicted the 6 lottery numbers. Sure, he got them together and they managed to get 4, but that final &#8216;prediction&#8217; was done using a camera trick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Farhan Rehman</title>
		<link>http://farhanrehman.co.uk/2009/09/11/who-wants-to-predict-the-lottery/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Farhan Rehman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farhanrehman.co.uk/?p=246#comment-52</guid>
		<description>@Robert - hehehe, indeed.. But having read the book the Wisdom of Crowds, and understood some of the basic principles behind divining/psychic precognitive type stuff, and also seeing some of his more obvious uses of suggestive subconscious pre-suppositions, I&#039;m curious to figure out if it&#039;s a Wisdom of Crowds approach that did it - or the sheer desire of a large enough support group (i.e. all the people who were watching the show and wanted him to get it right), that led to him getting the right numbers.. If you think about how he got the support of a few people, to influence a few coin tosses, this isn&#039;t that much different, just to a larger order of scale, in some regards..

@Seung-Wook, @Mark, @Luke, you&#039;ve all been added to the list ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Robert &#8211; hehehe, indeed.. But having read the book the Wisdom of Crowds, and understood some of the basic principles behind divining/psychic precognitive type stuff, and also seeing some of his more obvious uses of suggestive subconscious pre-suppositions, I&#8217;m curious to figure out if it&#8217;s a Wisdom of Crowds approach that did it &#8211; or the sheer desire of a large enough support group (i.e. all the people who were watching the show and wanted him to get it right), that led to him getting the right numbers.. If you think about how he got the support of a few people, to influence a few coin tosses, this isn&#8217;t that much different, just to a larger order of scale, in some regards..</p>
<p>@Seung-Wook, @Mark, @Luke, you&#8217;ve all been added to the list <img src='http://farhanrehman.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert (thirstforwine)</title>
		<link>http://farhanrehman.co.uk/2009/09/11/who-wants-to-predict-the-lottery/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert (thirstforwine)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 12:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farhanrehman.co.uk/?p=246#comment-51</guid>
		<description>You do realise it was VERY carefully set up so that when, not if, this fails to make any significant difference, he can say it was because you weren&#039;t disinterested enough, not in the right state of mind. Have fun though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do realise it was VERY carefully set up so that when, not if, this fails to make any significant difference, he can say it was because you weren&#8217;t disinterested enough, not in the right state of mind. Have fun though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Edge</title>
		<link>http://farhanrehman.co.uk/2009/09/11/who-wants-to-predict-the-lottery/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Edge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farhanrehman.co.uk/?p=246#comment-50</guid>
		<description>Sign me up Farhan . . . . . . .  would come in handy at the moment!
And like yourself and mark, really interested to see if it could be done.

Luke</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sign me up Farhan . . . . . . .  would come in handy at the moment!<br />
And like yourself and mark, really interested to see if it could be done.</p>
<p>Luke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Shaw</title>
		<link>http://farhanrehman.co.uk/2009/09/11/who-wants-to-predict-the-lottery/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 09:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farhanrehman.co.uk/?p=246#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Hi Farhan, like you, I watched the programme. I am really interested in the idea of what you think about, you bring about... It will be fun to have a group of us, working together to see if we can replicate what was on telly.. 

It may well be a trick, but it will be fun trying to see what we can achieve. It will also be great to meet some new peeps in the process of trying.

The only thing that I am not sure about is the level of commitment needed. I am happy to stay for the long haul, but perhaps an indication of what that entails should be communicated to all the participants..

What a great case study... what a great story... lets make it happen...

best

Mark Shaw
07990 743 564
mark@markshaw.biz
twitter.com/markshaw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Farhan, like you, I watched the programme. I am really interested in the idea of what you think about, you bring about&#8230; It will be fun to have a group of us, working together to see if we can replicate what was on telly.. </p>
<p>It may well be a trick, but it will be fun trying to see what we can achieve. It will also be great to meet some new peeps in the process of trying.</p>
<p>The only thing that I am not sure about is the level of commitment needed. I am happy to stay for the long haul, but perhaps an indication of what that entails should be communicated to all the participants..</p>
<p>What a great case study&#8230; what a great story&#8230; lets make it happen&#8230;</p>
<p>best</p>
<p>Mark Shaw<br />
07990 743 564<br />
<a href="mailto:mark@markshaw.biz">mark@markshaw.biz</a><br />
twitter.com/markshaw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seung-Wook</title>
		<link>http://farhanrehman.co.uk/2009/09/11/who-wants-to-predict-the-lottery/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Seung-Wook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 09:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farhanrehman.co.uk/?p=246#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Hey Farhan, just saw your tweet haha I&#039;d love to have a go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Farhan, just saw your tweet haha I&#8217;d love to have a go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Who Want’s to Predict the Lottery? -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://farhanrehman.co.uk/2009/09/11/who-wants-to-predict-the-lottery/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Who Want’s to Predict the Lottery? -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farhanrehman.co.uk/?p=246#comment-47</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Farhan Rehman and Farhan Rehman. Farhan Rehman said: @EdgeandBarrett @heatherataylor @michaelreuter @markshaw @ste_vee @mogston @chrisorourke If u want 2 join the experiment http://bit.ly/cpiW0 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Farhan Rehman and Farhan Rehman. Farhan Rehman said: @EdgeandBarrett @heatherataylor @michaelreuter @markshaw @ste_vee @mogston @chrisorourke If u want 2 join the experiment <a href="http://bit.ly/cpiW0" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/cpiW0</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
